t is no secret that the entertainment oligopolists are not happy with the change of space and form. But surely ripping your own CDs to raise your own iPod is, right? In fact, there is support for both the Supreme Court in MGM v. Grokster argument last year?
Apparently not.
The fact that the permit, a copy under certain circumstances is often or usually even make sitting necessarily mean that the copying fair use is when the holder of copyright denied such a permit. In this sense, wrote the statement on the advice for copyright owners in the MGM v.
If I understand what the RIAA says, perfectly legitimate means lawful until we change our opinion. So is your ability to continue to copies of your own CDs on your iPod a question entirely of their suffering. What about all the indie label CDs? Did you ask any of them for permission before your CD and what asked about all the major label artists to control their own copyrights? Not everyone is as well?
PS: The presentation also stated: It is also creates a backup copy of a CD with music, is not …. noninfringing use